Acetone recovery — batch still vs. continuous column

A spent-solvent stream (60 mol% acetone, 40% water) recovered two ways, so the Analysis panel's Batch distillation (Rayleigh) tool has something to be compared against — it had no curated example, and a batch calculation only means anything next to the continuous alternative.

The flowsheet is the continuous answer: a shortcut column recovering 98% of the acetone overhead and rejecting 98% of the water, giving 59.8 mol/s of distillate at high purity for 4.4 MW of reboiler duty.

The batch answer (Analysis > Batch distillation). Charge 100 mol of the same mixture to a still and boil it down until the pot falls to 10 mol% acetone: you distil 67.4 mol and the average distillate is only 84.2 mol% acetone. That is the Rayleigh result and it is the whole lesson — a simple batch still has one theoretical stage, so the vapour it makes is enriched but never pure, and the composition drifts the entire time. Reaching column-grade purity in a batch needs reflux and cuts (a batch rectifier), or a second pass.

Why the comparison is the point. Batch equipment is cheap, flexible, and right for small or campaign volumes; the column is right when the duty is continuous and purity matters. Having both numbers on the same feed is what makes that a decision rather than a preference.

Honesty notes. The Rayleigh tool integrates the differential mass balance for a binary charge at one theoretical stage — no reflux, no holdup, no column dynamics — and takes its relative volatility from the property package at the stated pressure. The column here is the FUG shortcut, a sizing estimate rather than a rigorous stage-by-stage solve.