MaximaLabs
Back to gallery

Reformate Process Flowsheets & Simulations

Explore 3 validated, solved Reformate simulation flowsheets in MaximaLabs — real components: benzene, toluene, methylcyclohexane, sulfolane, n_hexane, o_xylene. Open any one directly in your browser.

Solved via: PSRK, PENG-ROBINSON.

FEED
Solvent
feed
dist
btms
Qc
Qr
ED
Nonaromatics
feed
dist
btms
Qc
Qr
SR
Aromatics Product
Sulfolane Recovered
Aromatics complex, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Sulfolane extractive distillation of aromatics

Extractive distillation recovering benzene and toluene from a stabilized reformate's C₆-C₇ non-aromatics (represented by methylcyclohexane) using sulfolane, after Figure 10.2/10.6 of T. Brouwer (PhD thesis, TU Twente, 2021). A vacuum solvent-recovery column then splits the aromatics from the sulfolane (reported as its own product rather than recycled). Both columns converge (ED 44 iterations, SR 98, residuals ~1e-5): methylcyclohexane leaves overhead at 91.3 mol%, the aromatics product carries no sulfolane at all (0.00000 mole fraction) at 95.2% recovery of the feed's benzene and toluene, and the recovery column returns sulfolane 99.96% pure at 490 K. Both columns were originally mis-specified in the same way, and it is worth seeing once because the symptom looks like a thermodynamic failure rather than an arithmetic one. distillate_to_feed is a fraction of a column's TOTAL feed, and both were set above the amount of light key actually present, so each column was forced to drag its heavy key overhead to make up the flow. The ED asked for 0.15 of 140 mol/s = 21 mol/s of overhead when only 17.5 mol/s of non-aromatics exists, so 3.5 mol/s of aromatics had to come over — that was the 19.4% benzene lost to the raffinate. The recovery column asked for 0.42 of its bottoms against roughly a quarter of it being aromatics, so ~20 mol/s of solvent had to come over — that was the 42 mol% sulfolane in the product. Setting each to the light key's real share (0.125 and 0.265) removes both. The property method is the whole story here, and it is why this example ran unconverged for a long time. Extractive distillation exists because of solvent selectivity, so a cubic with van der Waals mixing rules — Peng-Robinson as this was originally written — cannot represent the one effect the column depends on; it was being asked to converge on a model that did not contain the physics. A plain activity model cannot be used either: sulfolane boils at 558 K, so a reboiler hot enough to strip it drives benzene past its 562 K critical point, where a gamma-phi formulation has no answer at all. What the system needs is both at once, which is exactly what a Ge mixing rule provides — PSRK is a cubic (no supercritical ceiling) whose mixing is driven by UNIFAC (real selectivity). pr-mhv1 converges here too, in 47 iterations.

7 unit ops • PSRK

224 0

View & open
FEED
feed
dist
btms
Qc
Qr
Split
Light
Heavy
Refinery reformer block, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Reformate splitter

A single column cutting catalytic reformate into a light benzene/hexane overhead and a toluene/xylene bottoms — the IECR 50, 5680 configuration from the ChemSep casebook.

4 unit ops • PENG-ROBINSON

225 0

View & open
FEED
feed
dist
side
btms
Qc
Qr
DWC
Lights
Aromatics MID
Xylene Bottoms
Reference model (Dejanovic et al. 2011)

Reformate splitter via dividing-wall column

A refinery catalytic-reformer stream (benzene/toluene/o-xylene plus a non-aromatic n-heptane proxy) is split into three purified aromatics cuts by a single thermally-coupled dividing-wall column instead of two ordinary columns in series — the same DWC economics as the BTX example, applied to a genuine reformate splitter duty. Dejanovic, Matijasevic, Jansen, Olujic, "Designing a Packed Dividing Wall Column for an Aromatics Processing Plant," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 5680.

5 unit ops • PENG-ROBINSON

224 0

View & open

Stop fighting legacy software. Build your first flowsheet in 60 seconds.