MaximaLabs
All examples
Simulation gallery

Phosphoric acid concentration: steam evaporator baseline (29 → 54% P2O5)

Phosphoric acidEvaporationSteamVacuum flashComparison study
See it live
Open this exact flowsheet in the workspace, already solved — tweak a spec and re-run.
Launch interactive model

The conventional wet-process step, at the scale of one Jorf Lasfar concentration line: 138 t/h of 29% P2O5 acid, heated by 3.5 bar LP steam in a graphite exchanger and flashed under vacuum (0.12 bar) to 54% P2O5, evaporating 64.0 t/h of water. The steam feed is tuned so the concentrate lands on 54.0 wt% P2O5 (the user variable p2o5_wt_product), which takes 71.7 t/h of steam — 1.79 t steam per tonne of P2O5, 43.4 MW of condensing duty. That is the single-effect ideal; the published plant benchmark of ~2.8 t/t carries exchanger approach, losses and off-design operation on top. The point of the number here is what it costs the site: at Jorf Lasfar this steam is a co-product of the exothermic sulfuric-acid plants, which is the fact any electric alternative has to beat. Compare the two sibling examples, phosphoric-acid-concentration-microwave and -hybrid. Model scope, stated up front. The acid runs on the brine package, which carries phosphoric acid as a non-volatile molecular solute with its CRC liquid heat capacity (145 J/mol/K) — the streams show the real H3PO4/water compositions and the acid's sensible heat is in the balance. What that package does NOT yet carry is the acid's non-ideal water activity: it runs Raoult's law, so the boiling-point elevation is the colligative one, right in sign but about a third of the real value (+9 K at 54% P2O5 here; the real acid runs 20-30 K hotter, and 85 wt% acid boils at 158 °C at atmospheric pressure). The Pitzer fit that closes it is published (Bakher & Kaddami 2018, Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 35(3) 1153, open access) and named in the package as the parameters to transcribe. No heat of dilution is carried. Both omissions move the acid temperatures, not the water removed nor the energy-carrier comparison, which is what the study turns on. The 320 K feed stands in for a hotter plant feed for the same reason. The acid heated at 1 atm here partly boils in the exchanger (the model's colligative boiling point at 1 atm); the real acid is kept liquid under static head and flashes in the chamber.

The flowsheet

The solved topology — every unit op's real duty, conversion, or split, read straight off a genuine converged solve.

ACID 29
LP Steam
hot
cold
hot
cold
Q out
HX
Flash
Condensate
Water Vapour
ACID 54

The stream table

Every stream's flow, temperature, pressure, and composition — real converged numbers, not placeholders.

See it live
Open this exact flowsheet in the workspace, already solved — tweak a spec and re-run.
Launch interactive model

Stop fighting legacy software. Build your first flowsheet in 60 seconds.