MaximaLabs
All examples
Simulation gallery

Polymerization reactor comparison: CSTR cascade vs. tubular (PFR)

PolymerizationCSTR cascadePFR / tubular reactorMn / Mw / PDI
See it live
Open this exact flowsheet in the workspace, already solved — tweak a spec and re-run.
Launch interactive model

The same monomer feed, split 50/50 into two trains at equal total reactor volume: a 3-stage CSTR cascade (each stage blending its own new polymer with the MWD already carried by the stream from the stage before it) versus a single tubular (PFR) reactor. Both converge to a real, different Mn/Mw/PDI — the PFR reaches higher conversion at the same total volume, but its cumulative polydispersity is measurably broader than the cascade's, because chain length drifts continuously with conversion along the tube while each CSTR stage makes its own local production under one fixed monomer concentration. See the 'Polymerization Reactors' docs page for the full reasoning.

The flowsheet

The solved topology — every unit op's real duty, conversion, or split, read straight off a genuine converged solve.

FEED
Split
Cstr1
Cstr2
Cstr3
Cascade Product
PFR
PFR Product

The stream table

Every stream's flow, temperature, pressure, and composition — real converged numbers, not placeholders.

See it live
Open this exact flowsheet in the workspace, already solved — tweak a spec and re-run.
Launch interactive model

Stop fighting legacy software. Build your first flowsheet in 60 seconds.