How to simulate dea natural-gas sweetening at 50 bar
A high-pressure gas-treating unit on diethanolamine, the canonical secondary amine: 100 mol/s of 5% CO₂ natural gas at 50 bar and 313 K against 200 mol/s of 25 wt% DEA (5.4 mol%), the rich amine let down to 1.8 bar, heated to 388 K and steam stripped, the overhead condensed. The enrtl-dea package carries DEA's cited protonation anchor (pKa 8.9) with a screening-grade carbamate constant. What it computes: a treated gas that is pure methane, a rich loading of 0.52 mol/mol — right at the carbamate ceiling of a secondary amine — a 5.1 mol/s CO₂ product at 89 mol% (the rest methane co-absorbed at 50 bar and water), 1.2 MW on the rich heater. Same model bounds as the MEA card: Kremser stages with the K at the entering liquid, open loop, regeneration to zero loading.
- 1Open the ready-made model
Open the "DEA natural-gas sweetening at 50 bar" model in the MaximaLabs workspace — no install, no license. It loads live on the canvas, ready to edit and run.
- 2Confirm the thermodynamics
This process is modeled with the ENRTL-DEA property package over methane, co2, water, dea — already selected, so the phase equilibrium and enthalpy are physically consistent from the first run.
- 3Review the flowsheet
The flowsheet chains 2× Strip, Letdown, 2× OVHD COND, Reflux DRUM. Every block is a real, solvable unit op you can reconfigure on the canvas.
- 4Run the simulation
Click Run. The deterministic solver converges the material and energy balances (recycles included) and fills the live stream table — the AI never invents a number.
- 5Read the results and iterate
Inspect the converged streams, tweak a spec, and re-run — or ask the AI copilot to explain a result or diagnose a failed solve in plain English.
- Thermodynamics
- ENRTL-DEA
- Components
- methane, co2, water, dea
- Unit operations
- 2× StripLetdown2× OVHD CONDReflux DRUM
Opens live on the canvas — free, no install.
Explore the model & flowsheetFrequently asked questions
- What does the DEA natural-gas sweetening at 50 bar model simulate?
- A high-pressure gas-treating unit on diethanolamine, the canonical secondary amine: 100 mol/s of 5% CO₂ natural gas at 50 bar and 313 K against 200 mol/s of 25 wt% DEA (5.4 mol%), the rich amine let down to 1.8 bar, heated to 388 K and steam stripped, the overhead condensed. The enrtl-dea package carries DEA's cited protonation anchor (pKa 8.9) with a screening-grade carbamate constant. What it computes: a treated gas that is pure methane, a rich loading of 0.52 mol/mol — right at the carbamate ceiling of a secondary amine — a 5.1 mol/s CO₂ product at 89 mol% (the rest methane co-absorbed at 50 bar and water), 1.2 MW on the rich heater. Same model bounds as the MEA card: Kremser stages with the K at the entering liquid, open loop, regeneration to zero loading.
- Which thermodynamic method does it use?
- The ENRTL-DEA property package, over methane, co2, water, dea — already selected. You can switch the method on the canvas before running.
- Which unit operations are in the flowsheet?
- It chains 2× Strip, Letdown, 2× OVHD COND, Reflux DRUM. Every block is a real, solvable unit operation you can reconfigure, add to, or remove.
- Do I need to install software or buy a license?
- No. DEA natural-gas sweetening at 50 bar runs entirely in your browser on MaximaLabs — free, no install, no license. Open the model to load it live and run the deterministic solver.
More guides like this
MEA post-combustion CO2 capture (electrolyte NRTL)
The reference amine process on the reference amine: flue gas (12% CO₂ at 1.1 bar, 313 K) scrubbed with 30 wt% aqueous monoethanolamine at a lean loading of 0.20 mol CO₂ per mol MEA, the rich solvent pumped and heated to 388 K, steam-stripped at 1.9 bar, and the overhead condensed at 313 K into a CO₂ product and a reflux-water stream. It runs on the enrtl package — carbamate/bicarbonate/protonation speciation with Davies activity, the CO₂ partial pressure a function of loading and temperature — which is what sets the rich loading of 0.53 mol/mol the absorber reaches and drives the stripper the other way at 390 K. What it computes: 24 mol/s of CO₂ into 695 mol/s of rich solvent, a 39 mol/s CO₂ product at 94 mol% after the condenser knocks out 109 mol/s of water, 3.9 MW of rich-solvent heating for 650 mol/s of circulation (the sensible-heat penalty the sensitivity sweep traces against solvent rate) and 6.8 MW of overhead condensing.
Refinery acid-gas treating: MDEA/PZ absorber-stripper
Simultaneous CO₂ AND H₂S removal from a sour natural-gas / refinery off-gas stream by a piperazine-promoted MDEA solvent — the mixed-amine chemistry legacy tools reach for heavy rate-based/OLI add-ons to model. A high-pressure absorber contacts the sour gas with lean MDEA/PZ solvent (both acid gases absorb into the amine); the rich amine is heated and let down to a low-pressure steam stripper that drives the acid gases back off as a concentrated acid-gas stream and regenerates the lean solvent. Runs on the new 'enrtl-mdea-pz' electrolyte package: a generalized speciation (MDEA protonation + piperazine carbamate/dicarbamate + CO₂/HCO₃-/CO₃-- + H₂S/HS- + water) with Davies activity — it correctly reproduces piperazine's promotion (the blend holds more CO₂ at a given partial pressure than MDEA alone).
High-CO2 LNG with amine capture and CO2 reinjection
One 5.3 Mtpa LNG train on a reservoir whose gas is 14 mol% CO₂, where the CO₂ is not vented but compressed to dense phase and injected — 2.8 Mtpa of it, at 200 bar, which is the scale that makes this a storage project rather than a gesture. Two things make this different from every other LNG example here. First, the acid-gas removal is real chemistry, in the same flowsheet as the cryogenics: per-node thermo_overrides run the absorber, the rich/lean loop and the stripper on the 'enrtl-mdea-pz' electrolyte package (MDEA protonation + piperazine carbamate/dicarbamate speciation) while the gas train and the cold end run Peng-Robinson — the amine unit and the MCHE are not two models bolted together, they are one solve. Second, the CO₂ goes somewhere: the stripper overhead is knocked back, two-stage compressed with interstage cooling and drying, and pumped to 200 bar as a ~96 mol% dense-phase stream ready for a reinjection well, rather than leaving as a vent. The sweet gas is water-washed, dried and liquefied in the C3MR cold end to LNG at ~116 K.
Pressure-swing ethanol dehydration (Gᴱ mixing rule)
Ethanol–water is the classic azeotrope, and pressure-swing distillation breaks it without an entrainer: the azeotrope moves with pressure, so a low-pressure column and a high-pressure column pass each other's azeotropic distillate and each recovers a pure product. The whole process only works if the property package tracks that shift — which is exactly where a conventional package choice falls between two chairs. This flowsheet runs the high-pressure column at 15 bar on pr-mhv1: Peng-Robinson with an MHV1 excess-Gibbs mixing rule, so the cubic equation of state gets its attraction parameter from NRTL's excess Gibbs energy instead of from a single binary interaction constant. Switch the thermo package (Solver menu) and compare the predicted azeotrope: | package | 1 atm | 15 bar | valid at 15 bar? | |---|---|---|---| | NRTL | 0.891 | 0.802 | no — γ-φ is a low-pressure formulation (~10 bar) | | Peng-Robinson (kij) | 0.586 | 0.613 | yes, but a kij cannot represent this azeotrope | | pr-mhv1 | 0.949 | 0.798 | yes | (mole fraction ethanol; the repo's DECHEMA-validated 1 atm anchor is 0.894.) At 15 bar pr-mhv1 lands within 0.005 of NRTL while remaining a genuine equation of state, whereas plain Peng-Robinson is off by ~0.19 and puts the azeotrope in the wrong place entirely. Selecting nrtl here also trips the applicability guard, which warns that the activity model is past its pressure ceiling and names the fix. The flowsheet demonstrates the mechanism on itself. Drop the column pressure to 1 atm and re-run, changing nothing else: the solve fails with SPEC_THERMODYNAMICALLY_IMPOSSIBLE, because at atmospheric pressure the requested bottoms purity sits beyond the azeotrope and no column can reach it. At 15 bar the same specification converges and the bottoms leaves at x_EtOH ≈ 0.924 — past the atmospheric azeotrope of 0.894, which is precisely the composition an atmospheric column cannot cross.
Ethanolamines plant: MEA / DEA / TEA from ethylene oxide + ammonia
The nitrogen analogue of the ethylene-glycol chain, and a major gas-treating-solvent process in its own right. Ethylene oxide reacts with ammonia through the same kind of CONSECUTIVE addition chain the glycols follow — EO + NH₃ → monoethanolamine (MEA), EO + MEA → diethanolamine (DEA), EO + DEA → triethanolamine (TEA), all atom-balanced and keyed on the shrinking EO pool. A large ammonia excess pushes selectivity toward MEA (the ~80/13/5 MEA/DEA/TEA slate a high NH₃:EO ratio makes, amine-side mirror of how a high water:EO ratio favours MEG). The separation strips the excess ammonia (recovered for recycle) and the reaction water, then splits the amines by boiling point (MEA 170 C < DEA 269 C < TEA 335 C) into ~99.8% MEA, high-purity DEA, and a TEA bottoms cut. HONEST SCOPE: the reaction chemistry is rigorous stoichiometry (real atom balances, realistic selectivity from the fixed conversions), and the amines are characterized as pseudo-components (Tc/Pc/omega from the open-data databank — MEA/DEA/TEA have no CoolProp entry) so they flash under Peng-Robinson. The purification uses spec-based component-split separators (the Aspen 'Sep'-block technique), NOT rigorous vacuum columns — the ethanolamines are wide-boiling with narrow adjacent-amine relative volatilities, the same wide-boiling-MESH limit measured for the glycol columns. The recovered ammonia is shown as an open recycle stream (an honest simplification, like the parent EO example).
Diesel hydrotreater with closed H2 recycle + amine wash
Diesel (an n-hexadecane carrier with a dibenzothiophene sulfur slice) and hydrogen react over a trickle-bed-equivalent reactor (dibenzothiophene + 3H2 → biphenyl + H₂S, the real HDS desulfurization route) after a fired-heater preheat, at a treat-gas rate of ~3 mol H₂ per mol oil (~380 Nm3/m3) — the hydrogen excess that keeps the catalyst wet with H₂, not the 0.09 stoichiometric need. The effluent is cooled to 520 K (a real unit's feed/effluent exchange) before the hot high-pressure separator takes the gas off; a cold separator at 290 K condenses the carried-over oil; an amine wash (a fixed-recovery separator — the same simplification the carbon-capture example uses, not a full electrolyte amine model) scrubs H₂S from the recycle gas, and a compressor closes the loop with a 3% purge. The separator liquids are let down to 3 atm: a low-pressure separator flashes off the dissolved hydrogen and most of the H₂S as sour gas, and a six-stage steam stripper (Kremser, ~10 mol% stripping steam) finishes the desulfurized diesel. Every hydrogen atom is accounted for: makeup = reaction consumption + purge + sour gas + stripper overhead. History, because it changed the solver: this flowsheet used to run 6 mol/s of makeup on 50 mol/s of oil. All of that hydrogen dissolved in the hot liquid, both separators produced no gas, and the recycle the stream table showed was a stale tear iterate the loop had accepted as converged — the flowsheet now clears an edge its unit did not feed, so a loop can no longer converge onto a stream it fabricated. The refluxed stripper column that fed on it, asked to hold supercritical H₂S in a 600 K bottoms under a 239 K H₂S reflux, lost a fifth of its hydrogen and was gated unconverged for the same reason.