Ammonolysis of phenol to aniline — a PENG-ROBINSON process flowsheet
Vapor-phase ammonolysis of phenol with excess ammonia to aniline plus water, per Figure 20.2 (p. 366) of Synthetic Nitrogen Products by Gary R. Maxwell (Kluwer, 2004). Unreacted ammonia and product water are let down to atmospheric and knocked out, then a column recovers the aniline. Phenol (bp 455 K) is very slightly MORE volatile than aniline (bp 457 K), so the aniline leaves as the bottoms and the residual water/ammonia plus the unreacted phenol go overhead.
Modeling assumptions & limitations
- 12 K apart is a genuinely hard split — the aniline product comes out ~86 mol%, carrying ~14 mol% phenol, at ~91% recovery. A sharper cut is a much taller column, not a tuning change, and Peng-Robinson carries no aniline/phenol association to sharpen it.
366 views 0 forks
- Rigorous PENG-ROBINSON thermodynamics, solved by the same engine every simulation runs on.
- 5 unit operations modeled: MIX, Reactor, COOL, Flash, COL.
- Focus areas: Ammonolysis, Amines, Nitrogen chemistry.
- Thermodynamics
- PENG-ROBINSON
- Components
- phenol, ammonia, aniline, water
- Unit operations
- MIXReactorCOOLFlashCOL
Opens in a new tab, loaded straight into the app — no setup.
Read the step-by-step guideReproduce this exact result from Python — the real client.get_example() → run_and_wait() path, not a mockup.
from flowsim.sdk import FlowSimClient
client = FlowSimClient()
example = client.get_example("aniline-from-phenol")
sim = client.create_simulation(example["title"], example["flowsheet"])
result = client.run_and_wait(sim["id"])
print(result["status"]) # "converged"
streams = client.streams(sim["id"])Related models
Polymerization reactor comparison: CSTR cascade vs. tubular (PFR)
The same monomer feed, split 50/50 into two trains at equal total reactor volume: a 3-stage CSTR cascade (each stage blending its own new polymer with the MWD already carried by the stream from the stage before it) versus a single tubular (PFR) reactor. Both converge to a real, different Mn/Mw/PDI — the PFR reaches higher conversion at the same total volume, but its cumulative polydispersity is measurably broader than the cascade's, because chain length drifts continuously with conversion along the tube while each CSTR stage makes its own local production under one fixed monomer concentration. See the 'Polymerization Reactors' docs page for the full reasoning.
Helium liquefaction (Linde-Hampson cycle)
A Joule-Thomson liquefaction loop: helium is compressed, aftercooled, precooled well below its ~40-51 K JT-inversion temperature, then throttled through a valve into a flash drum that draws off liquid helium while the cold vapor recycles back to the compressor suction — the same JT-cycle physics as the platform's LNG/refrigeration loops, run on a fluid whose inversion curve makes precooling mandatory before the throttle can cool it at all.
Cement kiln calcination + CO2 liquefaction
Preheated limestone (CaCO₃) enters an indirectly-heated rotary kiln that calcines it toward CaO, releasing a CO₂-rich off-gas; the gas passes a knockout drum, then is compressed and cooled to liquefy the CO₂ for transport/storage.
NGL fractionation: single-shell Petlyuk dividing-wall column
A natural-gas-liquids cut (ethane / propane / n-butane) split into three on-spec products by ONE thermally-coupled dividing-wall column instead of two columns in series. This uses the native Petlyuk unit op: a prefractionator whose reflux and boilup are supplied by the main column (the single condenser + single reboiler), solved by an outer Wegstein loop that converges the bidirectional vapor/liquid coupling to self-consistency — the coupling legacy sequential-modular solvers approximate with two connected columns whose recycle fails to converge.
Ethanol–water distillation
An 8-stage column concentrating ethanol overhead toward the azeotrope (the headline demo).
Corn wet milling: starch to high-fructose corn syrup
The sweetener train of a corn wet mill, end to end on the new sugar thermo package. A 35 wt% starch slurry off the mill is saccharified to glucose (glucoamylase, Michaelis-Menten), part-isomerised to fructose, enriched by simulated moving-bed chromatography, and concentrated to syrup in a two-effect evaporator. Three results are worth reading rather than assumed. The isomerase lands at 42% fructose — the real equilibrium of glucose isomerase, which is precisely why an SMB exists downstream: the reaction cannot reach HFCS-55 on its own. The SMB then splits on the cited Ca²⁺-resin affinities (fructose H=0.69 vs glucose H=0.26), sending fructose to the extract and recycling glucose in the raffinate. The evaporator finishes at 77 wt% solids, commercial HFCS syrup spec. That last number is only reachable because of boiling-point elevation. Modelled as inert solids the sugars give no BPE feedback and the evaporator is bimodal — it either does not boil or boils to dry sugar, with nothing in between. The sugar package (Norrish) supplies the real elevation, and syrup concentration becomes a smooth, controllable function of steam (42 → 77 wt% over the sweep range). Starch itself is carried as an involatile pseudo-component: it has no boiling point to characterise, so none is invented.