Post-combustion CO₂ capture — a PENG-ROBINSON process flowsheet
A separator recovers 90% of the CO₂ from a flue-gas stream — the sustainability layer then tracks the captured tonnes.
348 views 2 forks
- Rigorous PENG-ROBINSON thermodynamics, solved by the same engine every simulation runs on.
- 1 unit operations modeled: ABS.
- Focus areas: Post-combustion, CO₂ capture, Flue gas.
- Thermodynamics
- PENG-ROBINSON
- Components
- co2, n2
- Unit operations
- ABS
Opens in a new tab, loaded straight into the app — no setup.
Read the step-by-step guideReproduce this exact result from Python — the real client.get_example() → run_and_wait() path, not a mockup.
from flowsim.sdk import FlowSimClient
client = FlowSimClient()
example = client.get_example("carbon-capture")
sim = client.create_simulation(example["title"], example["flowsheet"])
result = client.run_and_wait(sim["id"])
print(result["status"]) # "converged"
streams = client.streams(sim["id"])Related models
Industrial steam boiler with capacity control
A natural-gas-fired water-tube boiler raising 50 t/h of steam at 42 bar and 400 C, with its three circuits and its capacity control on one flowsheet. Fuel: methane at 3 bar to the windbox. Combustion air / flue gas: an FD fan and a regenerative air preheater feed the burner at 15% excess air; the flame (adiabatic, 2252 K) then gives up its heat to the radiant evaporator, the superheater, the economizer and the air preheater in turn, and leaves the stack at 377 K with 3.0% O₂ dry. Steam: deaerated feedwater is pumped to 48 bar, warmed in the economizer, boiled in the evaporator and separated in the drum; saturated steam is superheated to 672.2 K and 2% is blown down. Capacity control: a steam-flow controller (FIC, integral action) sets the firing rate to hold the steam demand, a ratio station keeps combustion air at 15% excess, and the drum-level balance makes feedwater equal steam plus blowdown. At design it fires 49.92 mol/s of fuel (40.0 MW LHV); the evaporator takes 25.3 MW, the economizer 7.7 MW and the superheater 5.7 MW, for a direct efficiency of 96.7% LHV / 87.1% HHV. The heat-transfer banks are rated by UA, so a change of load redistributes the heat instead of reproducing it: run the sensitivity (70-100% load) and the superheat falls from 673 K to 605 K at 70%. Property method: pr-steam, Peng-Robinson for the gas with IAPWS-95 steam tables for pure water; plain Peng-Robinson puts 18% too little heat in the superheater. Bounds: no radiation or casing loss (a real boiler loses 1-2%, so efficiency reads high, and more so at part load); no dissociation in the flame; the radiant section is a fixed-UA exchanger, which overstates its absorption at deep turndown; no attemperator; and level and ratio control are the steady-state balances, not dynamic loops.
CO₂ capture + compression
Post-combustion capture recovers 90% of the flue CO₂, then a compressor and after-cooler condition it to pipeline pressure for storage/EOR — the real energy cost after capture.
MEA post-combustion CO2 capture (electrolyte NRTL)
The reference amine process on the reference amine: flue gas (12% CO₂ at 1.1 bar, 313 K) scrubbed with 30 wt% aqueous monoethanolamine at a lean loading of 0.20 mol CO₂ per mol MEA, the rich solvent pumped and heated to 388 K, steam-stripped at 1.9 bar, and the overhead condensed at 313 K into a CO₂ product and a reflux-water stream. It runs on the enrtl package — carbamate/bicarbonate/protonation speciation with Davies activity, the CO₂ partial pressure a function of loading and temperature — which is what sets the rich loading of 0.53 mol/mol the absorber reaches and drives the stripper the other way at 390 K. What it computes: 24 mol/s of CO₂ into 695 mol/s of rich solvent, a 39 mol/s CO₂ product at 94 mol% after the condenser knocks out 109 mol/s of water, 3.9 MW of rich-solvent heating for 650 mol/s of circulation (the sensible-heat penalty the sensitivity sweep traces against solvent rate) and 6.8 MW of overhead condensing.
AMP post-combustion CO2 capture (hindered amine)
The MEA capture loop run on 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol: the same flue gas (12% CO₂ at 1.1 bar), 30 wt% AMP (8 mol%) at a lean loading of 0.10, steam stripping at 1.9 bar and an overhead condenser. AMP is sterically hindered — its carbamate is unstable, so CO₂ goes to bicarbonate and one mole of amine can carry one mole of CO₂ where MEA's carbamate stoichiometry stops at half — and the enrtl-amp package's speciation reproduces that: the rich loading comes out at 0.70 mol/mol against the MEA card's 0.53, so 500 mol/s of solvent does what 650 mol/s of MEA did, with 3.1 MW on the rich heater instead of 3.9. The CO₂ product is 27.7 mol/s at 93 mol%. Same.
Flue-gas CO2 capture by solid-sorbent adsorption
A generic solid-sorbent (zeolite-13X-class) adsorption capture step on real combustion flue gas (13 mol% CO₂ — typical of a natural-gas- or coal-fired flue gas, a much higher CO₂ partial pressure than direct-air-capture's ~400 ppm case, which is why this uses the existing Adsorption unit op's real competitive-Langmuir isotherm directly on the flue-gas stream rather than the fixed-recovery separator shortcut the existing DAC examples use). Adsorption-based flue-gas capture is a real, generically licensed technology category (Linde's HISORP CC targets exactly this application); the isotherm parameters here are representative order-of-magnitude values for a zeolite-13X-class sorbent's CO₂/N₂/O₂/H₂O selectivity (real published 13X studies show CO₂ adsorbing roughly an order of magnitude more strongly than N₂/O₂, and water more strongly still, competing for capacity), not pinned to one specific cited paper's exact figures — disclosed as representative, matching MaximaLabs's convention when a precise source isn't confidently pinnable, rather than presenting invented precision. Adsorbent inventory (adsorbent_mass) is sized to a real, honest ~96% CO₂ capture rate — not assumed/rounded to a marketing-friendly number.
Sour-gas sweetening — six-category footprint
A fuel-fired feed-gas heater, acid-gas removal, and a VOC purge — vented to atmosphere — so the Sustainability panel shows all six impact categories at once: carbon, water, acidification (vented H₂S/NH₃ + combustion NOx), eutrophication (NH₃ + NOx), photochemical ozone (vented benzene) and cumulative energy demand. Illustrative screening vent compositions — a real plant Claus/incinerates the H₂S and controls the VOC rather than venting; the point is to exercise the multi-category footprint on a process that genuinely carries these species. Spec-based separators, so it converges fast and conserves mass.