DAP granulation loop: pre-neutralizer, ammoniating granulator, scrubbers — a PR-STEAM process flowsheet
Diammonium phosphate at the scale of one Jorf Lasfar (JESA) granulation train: 40.2 kg/s (145 t/h) of wet-process phosphoric acid is neutralised by ammonia in two steps and granulated in a loop that recycles four times its own product. The acid carries the composition Handley (IFA, 1984) gives for a commercial merchant-grade acid, per 100 g: 54.82 g H₃PO₄ (39.7% P₂O₅), 3.90 g H₂SO₄, 5.68 g of metal and fluoride impurities (carried as one inert lump) and 35.60 g water. It is pumped first through the tail-gas scrubber and the pre-scrubber, which take back the ammonia the reactors do not absorb, then into the pre-neutralizer, which holds a mole ratio NH₃:H₃PO₄ of 1.44 at 114 °C (near the ratio of highest ammonium phosphate solubility, so the least water keeps the slurry fluid) and boils off water with its own reaction heat. The slurry is sprayed onto the rolling bed of the ammoniating granulator, where sparged ammonia lifts the ratio to 1.845. New solid layers onto the recycled granules (an equal-thickness growth law on the full size distribution), the bed is dried to 3% moisture, a double-deck screen splits it at 3.35 and 1.70 mm, the oversize is crushed, and fines, crushed oversize and 73% of the on-size go back to the granulator. The rest is cooled and sold. The 73% is the split that puts the loop at the recycle ratio Handley reports, 4: a plant sets its recycle to absorb the slurry's water, so here it is an input, not a prediction.
Solved: 33.7 kg/s of product (121 t/h), 18.7% N and 47.6% P₂O₅ on a dry basis, above the 18-46-0 commercial grade, which is set by the acid's sulfate and impurities rather than by the 21.2-53.8 of pure DAP. Consumption per tonne of product is 0.227 t NH₃ and 0.474 t P₂O₅. An 18-46-0 product carries 0.219 t of NH₃ as nitrogen and 0.46 t of P₂O₅ per tonne by its grade alone; the difference is this product's richer grade and the ammonia lost at the stack. The recycle ratio is 4.0, and the loop converges on its own tear machinery (six tears, Wegstein). The pre-neutralizer releases 19.1 MW of reaction heat and evaporates 7.3 kg/s of water; the granulator releases 6.9 MW and evaporates 5.2 kg/s; the dryer takes 1.7 kg/s more for 7.1 MW. 0.029 kg/s of ammonia leaves the stack, 0.4% of what is fed, which is what two scrubbers at 90% recovery each give.
Modeling assumptions & limitations
- 1The speciation is stoichiometric: MAP, DAP and ammonium sulfate are assigned from element totals, so the grade is exact for the stated acid while solution equilibria, heat of solution and heat of crystallisation are not in the balance.
- 2The slurry water (18%) and the ammonia slip of each reactor (0.29 and 0.515 of the ammonia fed) are measurements from Handley's IFDC pilot plant, not predictions; the scrubber recoveries (0.9, after SPIC's report to IFA in 1998 that its venturi stages do about 90% of the scrubbing) and liquor mole ratios (1.5 and 0.7, JESA's stated practice) are inputs.
- 3The crusher's breakage function (Austin, phi 1, gamma 5, beta 3) is illustrative of a chain mill, not fitted to one; it is what lets the loop settle with a product d50 of 2.3 mm.
- 4The product cooler is a fluidised bed, one of the two cooler types the EFMA's BAT Booklet No. 8
- 5Names, swept by 500 mol/s of ambient air and fitted with a 30 °C cooling-water bank of 220 m2 at U = 250 W/m2/K. The area is sized so the product leaves at 48 °C, under the 120 °F (49 °C) TVA reports cooling ammoniation-granulation product to (OSTI 7013379); U, the air rate and the bed size are representative, not a plant's.
- 6The two ammonia feeds are supply headers: what the reactors do not draw leaves through each one's excess-ammonia port and is not consumption.
- 7The acid is fed as a stream at 47 °C; the phosphoric-acid plant upstream is not part of this flowsheet.
1 views 0 forks
- Rigorous PR-STEAM thermodynamics, solved by the same engine every simulation runs on.
- 8 unit operations modeled: 2× PRE, PN, GR, DRY, 2× SCR2, Crush, Split, COOL.
- Focus areas: Fertilizer, DAP, Ammonium phosphate, Granulation, Recycle loop, Solids, Ammonia scrubbing.
- Thermodynamics
- PR-STEAM
- Components
- water, ammonia, phosphoric_acid, sulfuric_acid, monoammonium_phosphate, diammonium_phosphate, ammonium_sulfate, phosphate_impurities, n2, o2
- Unit operations
- 2× PREPNGRDRY2× SCR2CrushSplitCOOL
Opens in a new tab, loaded straight into the app — no setup.
Read the step-by-step guideReproduce this exact result from Python — the real client.get_example() → run_and_wait() path, not a mockup.
from flowsim.sdk import FlowSimClient
client = FlowSimClient()
example = client.get_example("dap-granulation-loop")
sim = client.create_simulation(example["title"], example["flowsheet"])
result = client.run_and_wait(sim["id"])
print(result["status"]) # "converged"
streams = client.streams(sim["id"])Related models
Superheated-steam drying loop with MVR heat recovery
A wet cake is dried in a superheated-steam dryer (steam as the drying medium instead of hot air), and the evaporated moisture — pure steam — is recovered by mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) plus a trim superheater into high-grade superheated steam that reheats the recirculating drying medium. Superheated-steam drying is the energy-efficient route for biofuel and food solids (distillers' grains, beet pulp, lignite): because the drying atmosphere is steam, the evaporated water leaves as more steam whose latent heat is recompressed and reused, instead of being lost in a humid exhaust.
Crystallization + granulation finishing
A continuous MSMPR crystallizer, cake filter, and dryer feed a granulator that grows the dried crystals into free-flowing granules — the finished-product train after the mother liquor and dryer vapor leave.
Green urea synthesis
Green ammonia and captured CO₂ react over a single-pass stoichiometric reactor (2NH₃ + CO₂ ⇌ CO(NH₂)₂ + H₂O) at synthesis-loop conditions — the fertilizer step downstream of green ammonia. Screening fidelity: a real plant recycles the unconverted carbamate/excess ammonia to push per-pass yield well above this single-pass conversion; that recycle isn't modeled here.
Thermal (non-catalytic) HDA — broad aromatics feedstock
A real thermal-HDA licensor's process (non-catalytic, tolerant of a mixed aromatics feedstock and inert impurities) modeled as a genuine competing-and-sequential reaction network in a real plug-flow reactor, not a fixed-Keq equilibrium reactor like the simpler hda-toluene-dealkylation example. The main toluene dealkylation (toluene + H₂ → benzene + methane) uses real published kinetics: (-r_toluene) = k0exp(-Ea/RT)C_toluene*C_H2^0.5 (order 1 in toluene, order 0.5 in H₂, the classic 1.5-order thermal-HDA rate law), k0 = 5.67e9 (m3/mol)^0.5/s, Ea = 228,200 J/mol, heat of reaction -49,000 J/mol — transcribed from Shull & Hixon (Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Develop. 5, 147, 1966) as tabulated in Rase, H.F., 'Chemical Reactor Design for Process Plants, Vol. 2: Case Studies and Design Data' (Wiley-Interscience, 1977), Case Study 104 'Toluene Dealkylation', pp. 36-42 (unit-converted from the source's imperial (ft, lb-mol, degR) basis to SI). That same source explicitly states 'rate equations for the side reactions have not been reported' — so the coking/heavies side reaction (2 benzene → biphenyl + H₂, the real reaction that caps aromatic yield below 100% and drives decoking intervals) and the xylene demethylation feeding the shared toluene pool (o-xylene + H₂ → toluene + methane — the real single-methyl-loss pathway, not a lumped double-dealkylation straight to benzene, so this is a genuine reactions-in-series-and-parallel network, not three independent reactions) both stay illustrative order-of-magnitude Arrhenius parameters, tuned only to land in the source's cited ~98% main-reaction selectivity at 2:1 H₂:toluene — honestly labeled as such, not fabricated citations. H₂S/CO₂/ammonia ride through the flowsheet as inert impurities — exactly what 'impurity tolerance' means in a mass balance, not a special chemistry path. A real fired heater (rigorous combustion stoichiometry + stack energy balance, the same unit op used in the naphtha-steam-cracker example) brings the mixed fresh-plus-recycle feed up to reaction temperature — not a feed specified as already at 950 K. The H₂-rich high-pressure separator vapor is a real recycle loop: fresh feed joins recycled gas at a mixer ahead of the furnace, and past the separator the vapor splits into a recompressed recycle (85%) and a genuine purge (15%) that bleeds off the methane a single pass could never consume — the same role a purge plays in the ammonia-synthesis-loop example. Quench, the high-pressure separator, and a letdown-valve-plus-flash stabilizer strip dissolved H₂/methane before the aromatics split. The reactor is genuinely adiabatic, not isothermal: temperature is a real energy-balance-coupled ODE state (the adiabatic PFR mode) that rises along the reactor length as the exothermic reactions release heat — starting from the furnace's real ~900 K outlet (in the source's cited 894-922 K inlet range) and climbing as the reaction proceeds, self-consistent: the reactor's external duty, which an adiabatic reactor must have at zero, comes out at about 0.03% of the heat its reactions release (checked by its test, not assumed). One honest simplification remains: the final benzene/toluene/xylene-derived-benzene split still uses a shortcut separator rather than a rigorous column, for the same documented reason as hda-toluene-dealkylation: trace H₂/methane corrupts the column's wide-boiling initial-guess classification, and a fix narrowed to just that seed broke the shipped methanol-synthesis example when tried previously.
Ammonia synthesis loop (Haber-Bosch, ChemSep casebook)
The classic industrial ammonia loop: fresh syngas joins recycled unconverted gas, reacts over an equilibrium reactor (N₂ + 3H₂ ⇌ 2NH₃) at synthesis conditions, is chilled to condense high-purity liquid ammonia, and the remaining vapor splits into a recycle (back to the loop) and a purge — the purge exists specifically to bleed off the inert argon a single-pass reactor could never consume, which would otherwise concentrate in the recycle forever.
Wet-process phosphoric acid: electrochemical removal of copper and cadmium
Wet-process phosphoric acid (about 42 wt% H₃PO₄, 10 kg/s) carries the metals its phosphate rock brought in: iron, zinc, nickel, copper and the cadmium that limits how the acid may be used in fertilizer. Two flow-through electrochemical cells remove the two noble enough to plate from strong acid. The first holds its cathode at -0.05 V vs SHE: copper's Nernst potential sits far above that, so copper plates at its mass-transfer limit (plug-flow law, 99% removed) while zinc, nickel, iron and cadmium, whose potentials lie below the cathode, stay dissolved. The second cell runs at -0.55 V and is told that only cadmium plates: mass transfer alone would take 99.4% of it, but at that potential and 323 K the Nernst floor holds about 2.6e-5 mol/L in solution, so the solver reports the equilibrium-limited 91% instead. Each cell's current comes from the metal's partial current and the current efficiency you give it; the copper and cadmium currents regenerate phosphoric acid (one proton per dihydrogen-phosphate counter-ion), and the rest of the charge evolves hydrogen beside the anode's oxygen, which the cell gas reports, with a flammability warning.