Differential sedimentation — Stokes settling, size selectivity, Svedberg — a PENG-ROBINSON process flowsheet
Four centrifuges run side by side on the same medium so the d² law is visible as a result rather than asserted: 20, 50 and 100 nm protein particles at 200,000 × g, plus a 10.24 nm particle at 250,000 × g.
centrifuge is sized by Sigma theory, Σ = Q/(2 v_g), where v_g is the g-amplified Stokes settling velocity v = d²(ρ_p − ρ_m)g/(18η). So the reported sigma_m2 carries the settling velocity, recoverable as v = Q_liquid/(2Σ). Against the closed form the solver agrees to machine precision (relative difference 0 to 4e-16), which makes this a check of the tool and not just a demonstration of it.
What it shows: v(20 nm) = 1.53e-3 cm/s; the 100 nm particle settles exactly 4× faster than the 50 nm one, since velocity goes as the square of diameter and every other term cancels; and the 250,000 × g branch is sized so its velocity is 5e-4 cm/s, giving a sedimentation coefficient s = v/ω²r = 20.4 S — the Svedberg range real proteins occupy (catalase 11.3 S, ribosome ~70 S).
Bounded, and the bound matters. This is terminal Stokes velocity at constant field: no wall, no concentration gradient, no Boycott effect, and no hindered settling. Run the 50 and 100 nm particles for 30 minutes and the arithmetic says they separate by 51 cm, which no rotor can deliver — both pellet against the tube bottom first, the 100 nm one in about four minutes. The ratio is robust; the distance is what the formula says rather than what a centrifuge does.
It is also the reference wiring for a solids flowsheet: the particles arrive as their own phase: "solid" feed with a flat solids payload, wired directly to the centrifuge. Declaring them liquid or mixed, or routing them through a mixer first, leaves the unit with no solid-phase inlet and the solve fails.
29 views 0 forks
- Rigorous PENG-ROBINSON thermodynamics, solved by the same engine every simulation runs on.
- 1 unit operations modeled: 4× CF P23.
- Focus areas: Sedimentation, Centrifugation, Stokes law, Svedberg, Bioseparations.
- Thermodynamics
- PENG-ROBINSON
- Components
- water
- Unit operations
- 4× CF P23
Opens in a new tab, loaded straight into the app — no setup.
Read the step-by-step guideReproduce this exact result from Python — the real client.get_example() → run_and_wait() path, not a mockup.
from flowsim.sdk import FlowSimClient
client = FlowSimClient()
example = client.get_example("differential-sedimentation-svedberg")
sim = client.create_simulation(example["title"], example["flowsheet"])
result = client.run_and_wait(sim["id"])
print(result["status"]) # "converged"
streams = client.streams(sim["id"])Related models
Polymerization reactor comparison: CSTR cascade vs. tubular (PFR)
The same monomer feed, split 50/50 into two trains at equal total reactor volume: a 3-stage CSTR cascade (each stage blending its own new polymer with the MWD already carried by the stream from the stage before it) versus a single tubular (PFR) reactor. Both converge to a real, different Mn/Mw/PDI — the PFR reaches higher conversion at the same total volume, but its cumulative polydispersity is measurably broader than the cascade's, because chain length drifts continuously with conversion along the tube while each CSTR stage makes its own local production under one fixed monomer concentration. See the 'Polymerization Reactors' docs page for the full reasoning.
Helium liquefaction (Linde-Hampson cycle)
A Joule-Thomson liquefaction loop: helium is compressed, aftercooled, precooled well below its ~40-51 K JT-inversion temperature, then throttled through a valve into a flash drum that draws off liquid helium while the cold vapor recycles back to the compressor suction — the same JT-cycle physics as the platform's LNG/refrigeration loops, run on a fluid whose inversion curve makes precooling mandatory before the throttle can cool it at all.
Cement kiln calcination + CO2 liquefaction
Preheated limestone (CaCO₃) enters an indirectly-heated rotary kiln that calcines it toward CaO, releasing a CO₂-rich off-gas; the gas passes a knockout drum, then is compressed and cooled to liquefy the CO₂ for transport/storage.
NGL fractionation: single-shell Petlyuk dividing-wall column
A natural-gas-liquids cut (ethane / propane / n-butane) split into three on-spec products by ONE thermally-coupled dividing-wall column instead of two columns in series. This uses the native Petlyuk unit op: a prefractionator whose reflux and boilup are supplied by the main column (the single condenser + single reboiler), solved by an outer Wegstein loop that converges the bidirectional vapor/liquid coupling to self-consistency — the coupling legacy sequential-modular solvers approximate with two connected columns whose recycle fails to converge.
Ethanol–water distillation
An 8-stage column concentrating ethanol overhead toward the azeotrope (the headline demo).
Tray efficiency — real trays vs ideal stages
The same ethanol–water column solved with a Murphree vapor tray efficiency of 0.7 instead of ideal equilibrium stages. A real sieve/valve tray never reaches full vapor-liquid equilibrium — the vapor leaving it only partly approaches the equilibrium composition with the tray liquid, mixing in un-equilibrated vapor from the tray below: y = E·K·x + (1−E)·y_below (Murphree 1925). At E = 0.7 each of these 12 trays does 70% of an ideal stage's work, so the overhead ethanol is lower than an equilibrium column of the same tray count would predict — which is exactly why a real column needs more trays than a shortcut (ideal-stage) calculation says. Both HYSYS and Aspen RadFrac expose this per-tray efficiency; set murphree_efficiency back to 1.0 to recover the ideal-stage column. The efficiency auto-selects the component-flow Naphtali-Sandholm solver (the reduced-form solvers carry no explicit per-tray VLE row to apply an efficiency to).