Perfusion culture, where retention changes the answer

Continuous mammalian culture with a cell-retention device, so a deliberate bleed sets density instead of the medium-exchange rate.

Cell retention decouples density from medium exchange•Steady state pins growth to the cell-specific removal rate•Collapses exactly to a chemostat at zero retention

Fresh medium

Perfusion bioreactor

Cell-free harvest

Cell bleed

The actual dark-mode canvas: fresh medium perfused continuously into a bioreactor whose retention device keeps cells inside, so product leaves in a cell-free harvest while a deliberate bleed sets the steady-state density.

Fork this model →

Why a chemostat cannot represent this

In a chemostat, growth is pinned to the dilution rate — medium exchange and cell density are the same knob. Retention separates them: the perfusion rate sets nutrient supply while the bleed sets density, so steady state pins net growth to the cell-specific removal rate instead. At zero retention this model reproduces the chemostat exactly, which is the gate it is validated against.

\mu = \frac{\mu_{max} S}{K_S + S}\prod_j \frac{1}{1 + I_j/K_{I,j}} \quad \text{(multi-substrate Monod with inhibition)}

\mu - \mu_d = \frac{F_{\text{bleed}}}{V} \quad \text{(steady state pins growth to the CELL removal rate)}

q_p = \alpha\mu + \beta \quad \text{(Luedeking-Piret product formation)}

Unit ops shipped for this vertical

Perfusion bioreactor

A chemostat plus cell retention, so the bleed sets density rather than the medium-exchange rate.

Run preset →

Live plant integration

Stream viable cell density, perfusion rate and bleed rate from the bioreactor's OPC-UA server into this flowsheet's twin comparison — a retention device beginning to foul changes the effective bleed, which the solved steady state exposes before density drifts.

See the Digital Twin platform →