MaximaLabs
Back to gallery
Phenol/acetone complex, Antwerp, Belgium

Phenol + acetone via the Hock process (cumene peroxidation) — a PENG-ROBINSON process flowsheet

The route that makes ~95% of the world's phenol — and co-produces acetone, the classic two-products-from-one-feed economics. It completes the cumene story: the existing cumene-synthesis example makes cumene from benzene + propylene; this oxidizes it onward. Two atom-balanced steps: air peroxidation (cumene + O₂ → cumene hydroperoxide, CHP) at low per-pass conversion, then acid-catalyzed cleavage (CHP → phenol + acetone, near-complete). The spent air is vented, and the crude is separated by boiling point (acetone 56 C < cumene 152 C < phenol 182 C < CHP): high-purity phenol, crude acetone as the co-product, and unreacted cumene recovered for recycle. HONEST SCOPE: rigorous atom-balanced reaction stoichiometry; cumene hydroperoxide is a databank pseudo-component (no CoolProp entry) flashed under Peng-Robinson. The purification is spec-based component-split separators (the Aspen 'Sep'-block technique), not rigorous columns. The acetone product comes out ~98% because residual dissolved air (O₂/N₂) reports overhead with it — a real plant adds a light-ends/degassing column for polymer-grade acetone; phenol comes out essentially pure. Recovered cumene is shown as an open recycle stream.

222 views 0 forks

Cumene
AIR
MIX
OXID
Coolox
Oxflash
Offgas
Cleave
Coolcl
Acetcol
Acetone
Cumcol
Cumene Recycle
Phencol
Phenol
Heavies
What this showcases
  • Rigorous PENG-ROBINSON thermodynamics, solved by the same engine every simulation runs on.
  • 5 unit operations modeled: MIX, 2× Cleave, 2× Coolcl, Oxflash, 3× Phencol.
  • Focus areas: Phenol, Acetone, Cumene, Hock process, Co-production, Peroxidation.
Specification
Thermodynamics
PENG-ROBINSON
Components
cumene, oxygen, nitrogen, cumene_hydroperoxide, phenol, acetone
Unit operations
MIX2× Cleave2× CoolclOxflash3× Phencol
Open in workspace

Opens in a new tab, loaded straight into the app — no setup.

Read the step-by-step guide
Python SDK

Reproduce this exact result from Python — the real client.get_example() → run_and_wait() path, not a mockup.

from flowsim.sdk import FlowSimClient

client = FlowSimClient()
example = client.get_example("phenol-acetone-hock-process")
sim = client.create_simulation(example["title"], example["flowsheet"])
result = client.run_and_wait(sim["id"])

print(result["status"])              # "converged"
streams = client.streams(sim["id"])

Related models

Reference model (Luyben 2010)

Cumene production (benzene alkylation)

Benzene and propylene alkylate over a fixed-conversion reactor to cumene (isopropylbenzene, the feedstock for phenol/acetone via the Hock process); a downstream column recovers unreacted benzene overhead for recycle-quality purity while cumene leaves the bottoms. Luyben, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 719.

Illustrative WAO wastewater-treatment train

Wet air oxidation of phenolic wastewater

Liquid-phase oxidation of dissolved organics in wastewater by dissolved O₂ at elevated temperature/pressure (kept liquid, not flashed to steam) — a real, widely licensed generic technology (Zimpro and equivalents), not Linde-proprietary IP, so it's built directly from the real, exactly mass-balanced combustion reaction of a standard WAO test/design compound: phenol (C₆H₅OH + 7 O₂ → 6 CO₂ + 3 H₂O). Phenol is the compound most WAO literature uses as the reference organic for design/kinetic studies, not an arbitrary choice.

LNG receiving and export terminal

LNG front end and storage: guard beds, tank boil-off, driver limit

The parts of a 5.2 Mtpa LNG train that are not the cold box, and the four questions they answer that no bulk unit can — at real capacity, so the vessel sizes and duties are ones an engineer can check against their own plant. Guard beds: a sulfur-carbon bed takes mercury from 200 to 0.01 µg/Nm³ — the brazed-aluminium limit, because mercury attacks the plate-fin cold box by liquid-metal embrittlement — on a 4.8 m x 6.6 m bed with 4.2 years of life from a capacity balance — inside the 3-5 year window these non-regenerable beds are actually replaced on, which is what a turnaround plan needs. A 4A molecular sieve then dries the gas to 0.1 ppmv, the only route to a cryogenic water spec (a glycol contactor tops out near a −30 °C dew point), on a 4.9 m x 5.1 m bed running a 13.8 h cycle for 1.3 MW of regeneration duty. Storage: the LNG goes to a tank whose boil-off rate comes from a 0.05%/day guarantee but whose boil-off composition comes from a real equilibrium flash — and that is the interesting part, because the vapour leaves at ~11 mol% nitrogen against 1.1% in the feed. Nitrogen and methane are far more volatile at 113 K, so the boil-off is light and the stored liquid weathers heavier: nobody specified that, the flash found it. Recondensing: the boil-off goes back into the send-out LNG rather than to a flare, and the unit reports the LNG:BOG ratio (1999) against the minimum the energy balance demands (3.8), which is the constraint a terminal is actually operated against. The driver: a gas turbine burning plant fuel gas, rated 97.5 MW at ISO conditions, delivers only 84.5 MW at 35 °C — 5.5 MW short of its 90 MW refrigeration load, and flagged as such. That derate is computed from two physical effects (a fixed-geometry compressor swallows a fixed volume so mass flow follows air density, and hotter air costs more to compress), not from a vendor curve, and it comes out at 0.66%/K — mid-band for industrial machines. It is why a tropical LNG train makes less product in summer.

Ichthys LNG, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia

Gas-condensate LNG train: condensate, LPG and LNG

The LNG plant that is also a liquids plant, at real capacity: this is one 4.4 Mtpa train (a two-train plant is two of these), not a scaled-down sketch. A condensate-rich field arrives by trunkline as a two-phase stream: the slug catcher drops ~20 mol% of it out as raw condensate before a single molecule reaches the cold end, and the plant then runs two trains side by side off one feed. Liquids: the raw condensate is let down to an MP flash that strips the dissolved methane (without it the stabilizer's shortcut total condenser tries to condense methane at 8 bar, which is not a real stabilizer overhead), then stabilized to a C₅/C₆ product. Gas: sweetened and dried, chilled to 245 K to knock out an NGL cut, and the NGL demethanized and split by a deethanizer / depropanizer / debutanizer sequence into commercial propane (~98 mol%) and butane (~98 mol%) LPG plus a natural-gasoline bottoms. LNG: the lean gas goes to the same APCI C3MR cold end as the 'c3mr-lng-liquefaction' showcase — propane precool, mixed-refrigerant MCHE to 120 K, JT letdown to a 1.5 bar end-flash drum. Five sold products come out of one flowsheet, each a stream the solver computed. Watch the end-flash boil-off: it leaves at ~13 mol% nitrogen against 1 mol% in the feed, because the flash drum is where an LNG train actually rejects its nitrogen — nobody specified that, the flash found it. Dehydration is the real molecular-sieve bed, not a stand-in: a 4A sieve sized by length-of-unused-bed, which is what actually takes the gas to the <=0.1 ppmv the cold box needs — 95 t of sieve on a 5.5 x 5.5 m bed, a 17.5 h cycle and 1.4 MW of regeneration duty, with 0.47 bar of Ergun pressure drop. The AGRU spec is checked against the physics rather than assumed: 99.9% CO₂ removal leaves 33 ppmv, and at the coldest point in the train (115.9 K) the solid-CO₂ solubility limit is 232 ppmv on the measured-data basis — a 7x margin, so the sweetening spec demonstrably clears freeze-out instead of merely looking tight.

NGL recovery plant, Permian Basin, Texas, USA

Deep ethane recovery with propane-refrigerated feed chilling

Associated gas is chilled by an external propane refrigeration package before a demethanizer recovers ethane and heavier as NGL bottoms from a methane-rich residue gas overhead — the cryogenic-chilling role Ortloff's CCS/GSP processes play ahead of the turboexpander in a real deep-ethane-recovery plant. The mechanical refrigeration loop itself (compressor/condenser/valve) isn't separately modeled here; the chiller's duty is represented directly as the feed's cooled outlet temperature (the same honest-simplification pattern used for LNG cold-box examples elsewhere in this library).

Reference model

Gas compressor air-cooled aftercooler (fin-fan)

A natural-gas booster compressor followed by an air-cooled (fin-fan) aftercooler — the standard way to reject compression heat where no cooling water is available. The compressor raises the gas from 8 to 24 atm (hot discharge ~150 °C); the air cooler then rejects that heat to ambient air, cooling the gas back to 49 °C. Unlike a plain cooler, the air_cooler op closes the air side: from the process duty and the 35 °C design ambient it solves the air mass flow (a 15 °C air rise) and reports the fan power from the given fan static pressure. Honest scope: screening air-side model (fixed cp_air, ideal-gas air density, no fin/row geometry rating); an air cooler cannot cool below ambient, so the 49 °C target sits safely above the 35 °C air inlet.

Stop fighting legacy software. Build your first flowsheet in 60 seconds.